I am alarmed by the Arnaud de Borchgrave column below (my emphasis in red) which dates from 5 days ago. The usually wise and level-headed De Borchgrave is on the verge of allowing himself to become a conduit for Israeli propaganda, specifically when it comes to Iran. De Borchgrave is making the same mistake which the establishment media made in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. That mistake was to swallow hook, line and sinker the major premises promoted by the White House and the Israel Lobby to justify military action.

In the case of Iraq, the justifications were WMD, a nuclear weapons program, and an Iraqi link to al Qaeda and to 9/11 itself. None of it was true. All of it was lies. That is why Richard Cheney had to run over to the CIA HQ in Langley, Virginia every couple of weeks, and twist some arms. With the exception of the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain, there was no investigative reporting done by the establishment media to question the nonsense being dished up as legitimate casus belli. In retrospect, Saddam was telling the truth. It was Cheney and Bush who were the confidence tricksters. Remember what Mohammed Aldouri, Iraq's Ambassador to the UN, stated to the UN on October 17, 2002...

We have no intention of attacking anyone, now or in the future, with weapons of any kind. If we are attacked, we will surely defend ourselves with all means possible. But bear in mind that we have no nuclear or biological or chemical weapons, and we have no intention of acquiring them.

Today the target is Iran--again thanks to Tel Aviv, the "neocons", Dick Cheney and the Israel Lobby's control over Capitol Hill. The new party line is that Tehran is building an atomic bomb with the intent "to wipe Israel off the map". This is not true, but who cares? It is a good story and a wonderful reason to bomb Iran. It is true that Tehran did recently sponsor an international conference of scholars and scientists (those not in European jails for thought crimes) to examine the historical issue of what has come to be known as "the Holocaust". Perhaps this is the real reason that Tel Aviv wants to go to war. It feels insulted that someone is questioning the very basis of the Jewish state unsupervised and from a non-Jewish perspective.

Tel Aviv and the White House know that Tehran does not possess the Bomb. Even the CIA has stated that it would be many years before Tehran could produce an atomic weapon, if it were to decide to undertake such a project. Furthermore, the Mullahs have declared that Iran has no such intention, because it runs contrary to the teachings of the Koran. And the experts from Vienna have found no indication of a nuclear weapons program. In the meantime, of course, Tel Aviv has hundreds of atomic bombs at its disposal and the means to deliver them anywhere in the Middle East. In brief, we are being set up yet again by Cheney, Bush and the "neocons".

Cheney, Bush and the “neocons” are not stupid, they are excellent liars based on their track record, and it has reached the point where they probably believe their own mendacious propaganda. The question is, will it work again? It just might. Have you heard a peep out of the Democrats in Congress to block an attack on Iran? It is most unlikely you ever will.

Here is an important difference between Iraq and Iran. Since Iran will not be invaded by ground troops, its government will remain in power. Accordingly, there will be no way to verify in the aftermath that Tehran was not manufacturing nuclear weapons. A barrage of cruise missiles and bunker busting bombs will wreck as much of Iran as possible. Tel Aviv and Washington will then proclaim that they have done the world a great favor, by taking out Iran's nuclear weapons program. Mission accomplished. Tehran will be unable to prove it did not have nuclear weapons, and no one will particularly care. Tehran will be unable to demonstrate that Cheney, Bush, the "neocons" and the gentlemen in Tel Aviv are sociopathic liars, who launched a gratuitous war as a self-fulfilling prophecy.

===================

Never again?

Arnaud de Borchgrave // THE WASHINGTON TIMES // January 12, 2007

Throughout history, rulers, despots, nations and empires have humbled and humiliated, and with the advent of Adolf Hitler, massacred Jews by the millions. From the Exodus from ancient Egypt to the First Crusade, which didn't distinguish between Jews and Arabs, to the Spanish Inquisition under Tomas de Torquemada, to czarist pogroms, to the World War II Nazi genocide, some historians calculate that had Jews been treated like other citizens through the ages, they would number at least 200 million today. They now number less than 15 million. And from right to left, the 5 million Jews in Israel now feel threatened with extinction yet again.
    
In today's Israel, the overwhelming majority is convinced Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is synonymous with a second Holocaust. "We stood idly by as we were led to slaughter in Hitler's concentration camps and gas chambers in the 1930s and 40s," is a refrain frequently heard in Israel these days, "but never again." In a New Year's Day message, superhawk and former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of the kind of appeasement that threatened Israel's very existence.
    
Mr. Ahmadinejad recently held an international conference of Holocaust deniers. And Israelis are reminded daily that the Iranian president is a new Hitler who has to be terminated "with maximum prejudice" before a Persian nuclear weapon terminates Israel. The existential threat to Israel looms even larger, in Mr. Netanyahu's view, with the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group (ISG) report.

His critique's main points: (1) The ISG report smacks of rank appeasement when it recommends talking to Syria and Iran at a time when Iran has been given the whip hand in Iraq by the U.S. with a U.S. facilitated, pro-Iranian Shia-led government. (2) The ISG says solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a sine qua non to stabilizing the rest of the Middle East. The implied suggestion that it's now up to Israel to make further concessions to the Palestinians is yet another manifestation of appeasement. Israel must reject any perceived sign of weakness.
    
In reality, if the problem of Iran, which Israel's enemies call "the strategic backbone of Hezbollah and Hamas," were solved by forcefully eliminating its nuclear facilities, or a highly unlikely voluntary return to nuclear power for peaceful purposes under U.N. inspection, the conflict with the Palestinians would become easier to tackle.

Hezbollah and Hamas are rapidly arming themselves, thanks to the Israeli government's decision to refrain from further action against them. Since the cease-fire was declared, dozens of Kassam rockets have been fired at targets in the western Negev. If Mr. Olmert's government reacts limply to Iran's statements about its intentions to destroy Israel, "Why should we expect the world to act against them?" ISG says, "The majority of the political establishment in Israel has grown tired of a continuous state of a nation at war." When even Israel's leadership sends out a message of fatigue and weakness, "why should we be surprised that the world agrees?"
    
Mr. Netanyahu then said Israel "must immediately launch an intense, international, public relations front first and foremost on the U.S. The goal being to encourage President Bush to live up to specific pledges he would not allow Iran to arm itself with nuclear weapons. We must make clear to the government, the Congress and the American public that a nuclear Iran is a threat to the U.S. and the entire world, not only Israel."

There are signs this is already happening in Washington. Before the invasion of Iraq, the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld troika decided the ousting of Saddam Hussein had to become an integral part of the "war on terror." Eventually 60 percent of Americans thought Saddam was behind the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, though there was no link between the two. Today, the Bush-Cheney team faces the same spin scenario: how to weave the global war on terror and the Shia powers that be in Iran. This one is relatively simple: Iran trains and funds Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Palestinian territories.

Anticipating the new line, Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Independent, referred to "Iran and al Qaeda" on Wolf Blitzer's Sunday program on CNN. That Iran is Shia and al Qaeda Sunni becomes irrelevant in the new game plan that will most probably lead to U.S. air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2007-08. Can a Democratic Congress be bypassed under a blanket authorization already secured to hunt down transnational terrorists wherever they may be hiding?

"Neocons" who work closely with Mr. Netanyahu on what could be the next phase of a nascent regional war in the Middle East say Mr. Bush has the authority to take out Iran's nuclear threat. It has only one purpose -- to take out Israel. One Hiroshima-type nuclear weapon and Israel ceases to exit.
    
There is little doubt President Bush's geopolitical legacy as it stands today is unacceptable to someone who identifies with Winston Churchill roaring against appeasement in the 1930s. Iraq is either an unmitigated or mitigated disaster. And year-end analyses widely published at home and abroad listed Mr. Bush among the four worst presidents in U.S. history.

And if Mr. Bush doesn't take on Iran, prominent Israelis are speculating that President Clinton 2 (Hillary) will do so. Oded Tira, chairman of Israel's Association of Industrial Manufacturers, and former chief artillery officer in the Israeli Defense Force, said: "Bush lacks the political power to attack Iran. As an American air strike in Iran is essential for our existence, we must help pave the way by lobbying the Democratic Party, which is conducting itself foolishly, and U.S. newspaper editors."
    
Writing in Ynet News (online Yedioth Ahronoth), Mr. Tira said, "We need to turn the Iranian issue to a bipartisan one and unrelated to the Iraq failure. Hillary Clinton and other potential presidential candidates in the Democratic Party [must] publicly support immediate action by Bush again Iran." As for target Iran, Mr. Tira voiced widespread belief in Israel that the Jewish state must coordinate strikes with the U.S. "and prepare for the Iranian response." Fearless forecast: It will be formidable.
    
So isn't Mr. Ahmadinejad a new Hitler who has to be silenced before a Persian nuclear weapon silences Israel -- on grounds of dangerous insanity? As the New Year dawned, an Ahmadinejad spokesman said Adolf Hitler's parents were both Jewish and Hitler himself was one of the founders of the State of Israel.

    Arnaud de Borchgrave is editor at large of The Washington Times and of United Press International.